Paedophilia expert abused girls

[FussyPucker]

You really can't trust ANYONE these days........

An expert who advised on how to protect children from paedophiles has been jailed for seven years for the "systematic abuse" of three young girls.
Stephen King, 54, who lectured on how to protect children, had sex with a 10-year-old, a court heard.

King, of Herne Hill, south London, pleaded guilty to 21 counts, including sex with a girl under 13 and 10 cases of indecent assault.

He had taken 500 photographs and kept a diary of each sexual encounter.

He also kept a video showing acts of indecency with the girls, which took place between October 1996 and the end of 1999.

The three girls were aged between nine and 13 years old.

Peter Zinner, prosecuting, said all three victims had been deeply traumatised by the experience, with one attempting suicide by taking an overdose and slashing her wrists with broken glass.
Mr Zinner told Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court that King portrayed himself as an expert in child protection and had conveyed his "expertise" to the Crown Prosecution Service, Metropolitan Police and other agencies.

He was even credited in the final recommendations in the Court of Appeal on offering advice on sentences for paedophiles.

"Behind that veneer of respectability there was a dark secret," said Mr Zinner.

Previous convictions

Mr Zinner described the video as unique because "it is the first time that the police have an actual record of a paedophile grooming and conditioning a child and then committing acts of sexual abuse".

Investigations into King began in July last year when officers arrived at his home on suspicion of benefit fraud.

While at the property, one officer saw pornographic material by the defendant's computer.

Police then discovered King had been convicted in 1989 - under a different name - of gross indecency as well as making indecent material and was sentenced to six months in jail.

King was also investigated in 1999 on suspicion of indecent assault against the three girls involved in this case, but not enough evidence was found to prosecute.

William Nash, defending, said King was remorseful and hoped to be able to apologise to the girls one day.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/england/london/3516714.stm

[Lilith]

sick fuck...





I always found it ironic that many arsonists were firefighters too.

[dreamgurl]

yeah that's about how it goes, in order to make their problem ( sick one at that) acceptable they trun the the opposite of it is to throw everyone off and for them to get off.........some people deserve to be shot.

[LixyChick]

As if indecency isn't enough to describe his acts.....GROSS INDECENCY!

Hate to say this.....and usually don't (I try to never judge a book by it's cover).....but he looks like he had to be guilty of SOMETHING! Geezzzzzz!

[dicksbro]

The shame is that society will probably spend tens of thousands of dollars/pounds keeping him year after year after year. One sick creature.

[Sharni]

He needs shooting....preferably from his toes upwards...long and painful

Sick bastard

[jseal]

What a drag! Those poor kids.

So bad. So wrong.

I can only hope that someday they can become whole again. Healthy. Repaired.

It will be a long while till then.

[Catch22]

I wonder if there had not been a video if anything would have been done. As I have posted on here before, I reported things going on to do with a couple of sites on the net. As there was no pictures to be had, the cops didn't give a shit.

[Gilly]

I'd say string him up, old Indian style- butt ass naked under the blazing sun, staked to the ground, and free for torment. Maybe take a carrot peeler or cheese slicer to his dick. Sick fuck. God, I hope he get's raped hourly in jail.

[BIBI]

Only 7 years? Something wrong with that isn't there?

In my city we have Dudley Dorights who have programs to take in these men upon release from jail. Right now a paedophile with a forty year history of convictions for abusing kids, stalking, indecent exposure. The list is endless. He was released with strict conditions.....for a year he will be not be allowed out in public without someone in attendance. The city is in an uproar and petitions are being gathered to have him removed from here and of course it will prove a pointless excersise. So he will be babysat for a year and then be given privilges to go out and about to re-offend once more, for after a year has passed most people will forget he is here......but other than lynching what is the solution? One of my kid's teachers, a children's lawyer for our local Child Protection Agency, a scout leader, and a cop in town here all are offenders......many many more too I assume, but what can be done when the offender can be anyone's family member.
We must do more to educate our kids and parents for so many think it can't happen to them and it most definately can for I take kids in my home who are victims of this and I see the long term damage that has been inflicted upon them. I say....lock them up and throw away the key until they are "cured". That will be forever for there is no cure and these monsters think they are doing what comes natural.

[Lilith]

And mothers who go nuts and kill them is something that comes naturally too.

[BIBI]

Originally posted by Lilith
And mothers who go nuts and kill them is something that comes naturally too.


Oh I'm all for that too if we lived in a perfect world.

Unfortunately it's against the law too.

I would have without hesitation murdered someone if they molested my children when they were young and my grandson now.

[Lilith]

In general I am only for violence between consenting adults :D but I know myself well enough to know I'd lack the control necessary to avoid letting my motherly instincts take over.

[BIBI]

And the ironic thing is that we would get more jail time than the molester.

[Lilith]

You are right!!!! Unfortunately:rolleyes:

[Catch22]

I just found a site that lists the age of consent for everywhere in the world. It can be as low as 12 and as high as 21. So he could have bonked that 13 year old in Mexico or Holland and been legal. Even in the USA a few states have it at 14. It is the picture taking that is getting them into trouble. Not the sex.

[Loulabelle]

I am happy to accept that paedophilia is an "incurable" desire, just as the rest of us have little control over our sexuality (there, is no 'cure' for being gay, for example) but the fact that this sexual preference causes long lasting damage to children who have not willingly consented, means I honestly feel that paedophiles should be 'put down' like a sick animal.


This is not about revenge, torture or even punishment - if anything it is to release these terminally ILL people from the torment of their own lives, as well as to protect our children from harm.

[Catch22]

My friend in Texas is on a lot of heavy duty drugs due to flaskbacks of things her father did to her when she was 9. She is 37 now and can not keep it blocked anymore without help. I do not think drugs help, but there are no victim help groups where she is.

[having_fun]

Rehabilitation does not work for those sick fucks that prey on children. When they are caught they need to be taken out of the gene pool.

[BIBI]

Originally posted by Catch22
I just found a site that lists the age of consent for everywhere in the world. It can be as low as 12 and as high as 21. So he could have bonked that 13 year old in Mexico or Holland and been legal. Even in the USA a few states have it at 14. It is the picture taking that is getting them into trouble. Not the sex.


The man in the attached article is a paedophile who used his occupation to further his perversions. He was in a position of trust and by virtue of his craft was allowed to free reign with children. Sometimes the only concrete proof is pictures that enable a charge to stick, but there are times that words alone by children have been enough to garner enough to charge these creeps.

The teacher in my kids school had no pics......just the words for a few brave young girls who told the truth.
Pictures are undeniable proof....and as for age of consent, most paedophiles do not adhere to that statute. They go for the age that feeds their so called natural needs, whether it is a 2 year old or a 14 year old. Age has nothing to do with it if a child tells that he/she has been forced or coherced into doing something sexual that they don't want to do. It is called sexual assault......not bonking.

[Vigil]

Did you know that at least ten percent of child sex abusers are women. It is so taboo to our culture that noone wishes to acknowledge this fact.

I saw a woman child sex abuser being interviewed and she presented her situation as a medical condition that she had no control over very lucidly.

[jseal]

Vigil,

No, I did not. Interesting how this subject does not yet admit easily of a debate on the distaff side.

[BIBI]

I will acknowledge it Vigil....

In fact over the past 10 years there has been a great increase in the number of complaints made against women.
There are also up to five internet sites devoted to woman/child love. The North American Man Boy Love Association now has a female auxiliary branch that is growing in leaps and bounds.

It used to be thought that female paedophiles were more likely subordinates who worked hand in hand with their male partners to aid them in acquiring children. In writing this I can think of four cases off the top of my head that supports this but I am very sure that there are women who are just as perverse and vile as male offenders.

I think that the spirit of this thread was created and nurtured about males only because the article was speaking of a male.

[Lilith]

Just yesterday here, a teacher was found guilty and will most likely go to prison for 15 years for having a slumber party and sex with her male students. The one she was convicted for abusing was 15. I'd have tore her ass to shreds if I were the boy's mother no differently if she were a male.

[Vigil]

I can understand why countries have different ages of consent. Some recognise the point of sexual maturity and some psychological maturity and some fudge the two.

I have grown up in a country where it is normal for 16 year olds to have sex which must seem as odd to those who are used to this being a criminal act as the Netherlands being used to 14 year olds having sex is to me. So, if a 14 year old Dutch girl had sex with a 17 year old American boy, it would be the girl who was the criminal. Bizarre isn’t it?

So you have the situation where someone may get 15 years in the States for making many 15 year old boys fantasies come true and in the UK we have only sent a completely sick bastard down for seven.

It is also of interest to me that we are sexually prejudiced - well I will admit that I am. A fifteen year old boy I presume to be a lucky sod for having a 30 something woman, whilst a thirty something man having sex with a fifteen year old girl would exact a very different response from me.