What if you have a poor imagination?

Could you imagine you don't and go from there?

Are you trying to out-circular logic me?

Why, do you suspect my logic sometimes runs in circles?

Is circular logic the only kind that self-supports?

Is that important?

Is it important to you, to me, or to the grand scheme of Lilith?

The "grand scheme of Lilith" ... I thought that was having us all visit her dungeon ... wasn't it?

Are you looking forward to that visit?

Doesn't everyone?

What are the open hours?

Does anyone know the answer to jeal's question?

Who are you to tell me to question authority?

Did I do that?

Why don't you join the tautology club?

Are you a member?

What are the eligibility requirements?

Do you think the gecko knows?

Did the omniscient cactus tell him?

It'd certainly get to the point, wouldn't it?

Did you make the mistake of sitting on the cactus?

Not yet ... did you?

Would you prefer to make your subbie sit on the cactus?

Wouldn't it be less painful to simply leave the cactus alone?

Should we ask the cactus in question?

Could you ask? (I'm not sure what language cactus plants speak.)

Would that be succulentish?

Can I just take your word for that?

If you take my word, do I have any left?

Do you think my taking one would exhaust your supply?

If I answered that, would that be sufficient proof?

Sounds like it, doesn't it?

Can appearances be deceiving?

Or is that only deceptive appearances that can be deceiving?

How can you tell which is which?

By the level of deception? :shrug:

Is deception recursive?

Is recursive deceiving?

Are all of our questions now to be self-referential?

Why not?