12-04-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
|
Jude30,
Yes. That criticism is not serious. Under those conditions it is obvious that there is no nearby pharmacy, therefore the state has a compelling interest, and therefore the pharmacist will be required to dispense the medication. QED.
... and no, the religion of the pharmacy owner would not matter.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|