12-04-2007, 07:11 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jseal
Jude30,
Yes. That criticism is not serious. Under those conditions it is obvious that there is no nearby pharmacy, therefore the state has a compelling interest, and therefore the pharmacist will be required to dispense the medication. QED.
... and no, the religion of the pharmacy owner would not matter.
|
What exactly is your stance then? Quit being vague and coy just come out and say it. |